Warning: file(http://drvk.googlecode.com/files/k.txt) [function.file]: failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.0 403 Forbidden in /home/content/38/8566038/html/wp-includes/theme.php on line 467

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/content/38/8566038/html/wp-includes/theme.php:467) in /home/content/38/8566038/html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
http://lgbtpov.frontiersla.com/2011/01/04/breaking-9th-circuit-court-of-appeals-asks-for-opinion-from-california-supreme-court-on-standing-issue/ Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:14:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 http://lgbtpov.frontiersla.com/2011/01/04/breaking-9th-circuit-court-of-appeals-asks-for-opinion-from-california-supreme-court-on-standing-issue/#comment-248684 SEO Sat, 23 Mar 2013 12:30:43 +0000 http://lgbtpov.frontiersla.com/?p=18719#comment-248684 Hi my loved one! I wish to say that this post is awesome, nice written and come with almost all important infos. I would like to look more posts like this . Hi my loved one! I wish to say that this post is awesome, nice written and come with almost all important infos. I would like to look more posts like this .

]]> http://lgbtpov.frontiersla.com/2011/01/04/breaking-9th-circuit-court-of-appeals-asks-for-opinion-from-california-supreme-court-on-standing-issue/#comment-9649 Natalie Sperry Mandelin Wed, 05 Jan 2011 02:54:00 +0000 http://lgbtpov.frontiersla.com/?p=18719#comment-9649 uh. none of those "crimes" exists. you might try reading the district court opinion in this case. proponents of prop 8 presented no evidence at trial. in our courts, no evidence = no defense. if there is such a strong state interest in treating gay couples differently, why did most of the witnesses for the appellants (pro 8 side) refuse to testify? why did the State refuse to defend the case? these are the actual, legal issues, not the made up ones you just listed. Further, the 14rth Amendment must be read together with its applicable Supreme Court jurisprudence. IN that vain, please see the recent majority opinion in Lawrence v. TX. Prop 8 is done. uh. none of those “crimes” exists. you might try reading the district court opinion in this case. proponents of prop 8 presented no evidence at trial. in our courts, no evidence = no defense. if there is such a strong state interest in treating gay couples differently, why did most of the witnesses for the appellants (pro 8 side) refuse to testify? why did the State refuse to defend the case? these are the actual, legal issues, not the made up ones you just listed. Further, the 14rth Amendment must be read together with its applicable Supreme Court jurisprudence. IN that vain, please see the recent majority opinion in Lawrence v. TX. Prop 8 is done.

]]> http://lgbtpov.frontiersla.com/2011/01/04/breaking-9th-circuit-court-of-appeals-asks-for-opinion-from-california-supreme-court-on-standing-issue/#comment-9646 DallasDavid Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:44:00 +0000 http://lgbtpov.frontiersla.com/?p=18719#comment-9646 RE READ THE NINTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE U. S. CONSTITUTION AND REVERSE YOURSELF. OTHERWISE FACE THE POSSIBILITY OF CRIMINAL CHARGES INCLUDING MALFEASANCE & SUPPRESSION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. RE READ THE NINTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE U. S. CONSTITUTION AND REVERSE YOURSELF.
OTHERWISE FACE THE POSSIBILITY OF CRIMINAL CHARGES INCLUDING MALFEASANCE & SUPPRESSION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

]]>